FORMAT
BOOKS
PACKAGES
EDITION
PUBLISHER
CONTENT TYPE
Act
Admin Code
Announcements
Bill
Book
CADD File
CAN
CEU
Charter
Checklist
City Code
Code
Commentary
Comprehensive Plan
Conference Paper
County Code
Course
DHS Documents
Document
Errata
Executive Regulation
Federal Guideline
Firm Content
Guideline
Handbook
Interpretation
Journal
Land Use and Development
Law
Legislative Rule
Local Amendment
Local Code
Local Document
Local Regulation
Local Standards
Manual
Model Code
Model Standard
Notice
Ordinance
Other
Paperback
PASS
Periodicals
PIN
Plan
Policy
Product
Product - Data Sheet
Program
Provisions
Requirements
Revisions
Rules & Regulations
Standards
State Amendment
State Code
State Manual
State Plan
State Standards
Statute
Study Guide
Supplement
Sustainability
Technical Bulletin
All
|
Description of PD 7502:2003 2003This Published Document (PD) gives guidance on how to measure the effectiveness, efficiency and value of KM within and between organizations. The PD is therefore intended for employees, managers, directors or anyone else involved in a programme of measuring KM in or between organizations. The PD combines both desk and primary research and also offers a comparison of different models and case studies. It explores the possibility of measuring both KM as a process and knowledge (or “Intellectual Capital”) as an asset. (Readers should note, however, that although this PD touches upon various management sciences, including asset management, it does so only by way of example or analogy.)
This Guide to Measurements in Knowledge Management is intended to provide its readers with a practical introduction to measurement in the context of KM, and in the related area of Intellectual Capital (IC). The authors have therefore included the following in this guide:
Readers should note that this guide is intended as a:
In the hope of encouraging a public debate on KM and IC measurements, BSI will provide readers with a framework for feedback, ideas and questions relating to this guide. Readers who would like to get involved with further KM projects should contact BSI at knowledge@bsi-global.com. The authors of this guide are not recommending any particular measurement approach to KM or IC. Their aim is simply to provide “informed clarity”. They are therefore presenting readers with a range of alternative tools and approaches, which should to allow them to either get started in KM measurement, or take their current measurement activities to a new level. In the interest of impartiality, it should be noted that many people believe in the value of KM, but many remain sceptical about how far one can actually measure such value. They point to the danger of false measures (for example, the number of “hits” on a website or KM system does not in itself measure that system’s real value to the user) and remind the user that popular measurement tools such as the Balanced Scorecard (see clause 3.4.3) are discretionary rather than mandatory, and have yet to prove their staying power during economic downturns. Nevertheless, there is a growing body of both anecdotal research (see clause 6) and published research (see clause 5) that appears to indicate that KM and IC measurements are here to stay, and that organizations of all types – public and private, large and small, commercial and academic – should understand where this field is heading and feel informed enough to make their own decisions. This is, in short, what this guide aims to do. This document gives guidance on how to measure the effectiveness, efficiency and value of KM within and between organisations. Combines both desk and primary research and also offers a comparison of different models and case studies.
About BSIBSI Group, also known as the British Standards Institution is the national standards body of the United Kingdom. BSI produces technical standards on a wide range of products and services and also supplies certification and standards-related services to businesses. |
GROUPS
|