Security checkdata:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/b97cb/b97cb213b46faeaaa7c66396a6ae87aea1b9e409" alt=""
Please login to your personal account to use this feature.
Please login to your authorized staff account to use this feature.
Are you sure you want to empty the cart?
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/bd058/bd05802794419999aad39acaac37ca55b8a61770" alt=""
PD IEC TS 62836:2020 Measurement of internal electric field in insulating materials. Pressure wave propagation method, 2020
- undefined
- CONTENTS
- FOREWORD
- INTRODUCTION
- 1 Scope
- 2 Normative references
- 3 Terms, definitions and abbreviated terms [Go to Page]
- 3.1 Terms and definitions
- 3.2 Abbreviated terms
- 4 Principle of the method
- Figures [Go to Page]
- Figure 1 – Principle of the PWP method
- 5 Samples
- 6 Electrode materials
- 7 Pressure pulse wave generation
- 8 Set-up of the measurement [Go to Page]
- Figure 2 – Measurement set-up for the PWP method
- Figure 3 – Sample of circuit to protect the amplifier from damage by a small discharge on the sample
- 9 Calibrating the electric field
- 10 Measurement procedure
- 11 Data processing for the experimental measurement
- 12 Measurement examples [Go to Page]
- 12.1 Samples
- 12.2 Pressure pulse generation
- 12.3 Calibration of sample and signal
- Figure 4 – Measured current signal under –5,8 kV
- 12.4 Testing sample and experimental results
- Figure 5 – First measured current signal (< 1 min)
- Figure 6 – Measured current signal under –46,4 kV, after 1,5 h under high voltage
- Figure 7 – Measured current signal without applied voltage, after 1,5 h under high voltage
- Figure 8 – Internal electric field distribution under –5,8 kV
- Figure 9 – Internal electric field distribution under –46,4 kV, at the initial state
- Figure 10 – Internal electric field distribution under –46,4 kV, after 1,5 h under high voltage
- Figure 11 – Internal electric field distribution without applied voltage after 1,5 h under high voltage
- Annex A (informative)Preconditional method of the original signal for the PWP method [Go to Page]
- A.1 Simple integration limitation
- Figure A.1 – Comparison between practical and perfect pressure pulses
- A.2 Analysis of the resiliency effect and correction procedure
- Figure A.2 – Original signal of the sample free of charge under moderate voltage
- A.3 Example of the correction procedure on a PE sample
- Figure A.3 – Comparison between original and corrected reference signals with a sample free of charge under moderate voltage
- A.4 Estimation of the correction coefficients
- Figure A.4 – Electric field in a sample under voltage with space charge calculated from original and corrected signals
- Figure A.5 – Geometrical characteristics of the reference signal for the correction coefficient estimation
- Figure A.6 – Reference signal corrected with coefficients graphically obtained and adjusted
- A.5 MATLAB® code
- Figure A.7 – Electric field in a sample under voltage with space charge calculated with graphically obtained coefficient and adjusted coefficient
- Table A.1 – Variants of symbols used in the text
- Annex B (informative)Linearity verification of the measuring system [Go to Page]
- B.1 Linearity verification
- B.2 Sample conditions
- B.3 Linearity verification procedure
- B.4 Example of linearity verification
- Figure B.1 – Voltage signals obtained from the oscilloscope by the amplifier with different amplifications
- Figure B.2 – Current signals induced by the sample, considering the input impedance and the amplification of the amplifier
- Figure B.3 – Relationship between the measured current peak of the first electrode and applied voltage [Go to Page]