Security checkdata:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/b97cb/b97cb213b46faeaaa7c66396a6ae87aea1b9e409" alt=""
Please login to your personal account to use this feature.
Please login to your authorized staff account to use this feature.
Are you sure you want to empty the cart?
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/bd058/bd05802794419999aad39acaac37ca55b8a61770" alt=""
BS EN IEC 62836:2024 - TC Tracked Changes. Measurement of internal electric field in insulating materials. Pressure wave propagation method, 2024
- A-30450428.pdf [Go to Page]
- undefined
- European foreword
- Endorsement notice [Go to Page]
- English [Go to Page]
- CONTENTS
- FOREWORD
- INTRODUCTION
- 1 Scope
- 2 Normative references
- 3 Terms, definitions and abbreviated terms [Go to Page]
- 3.1 Terms and definitions
- 3.2 Abbreviated terms
- 4 Principle of the method
- Figures [Go to Page]
- Figure 1 – Principle of the PWP method
- 5 Samples
- 6 Electrode materials
- 7 Pressure pulse wave generation
- 8 Set-up of the measurement [Go to Page]
- Figure 2 – Measurement set-up for the PWP method
- Figure 3 – Sample of circuit to protect the amplifier from damage by a small discharge on the sample
- 9 Calibrating the electric field
- 10 Measurement procedure
- 11 Data processing for experimental measurement
- 13 Impact of coaxial geometry [Go to Page]
- 13.1 Measuring set-up of pressure wave propagation method for the coaxial geometry sample
- 13.2 Physical model in coaxial geometry
- Figure 4 – Diagram of the pressure wave propagationmethod set-up for a coaxial sample
- Figure 5 – Diagram of wave propagation of PWP for a coaxial geometry sample
- 13.3 Measuring conditions
- 13.4 Calibration of electric field for a coaxial sample [Go to Page]
- 13.4.1 Summary
- 13.4.2 Linearity verification
- 13.4.3 Validity verification of the ratio between two current peaks
- Figure 6 – Diagram of the propagation of pressure wave on the section of a cylinder [Go to Page]
- 13.4.4 Method for retrieving internal electric field from the measured current signal
- Figure 7 – Flowchart for the computation of the electric fieldin a coaxial sample from PWP measured currents
- Annex A (informative)Preconditional method of the original signal forthe PWP method on a planar sample [Go to Page]
- A.1 Simple integration limitation
- Figure A.1 – Comparison between practical and ideal pressure pulses
- A.2 Analysis of the resiliency effect and correction procedure
- Figure A.2 – Original signal of the sample free of charge under moderate voltage
- A.3 Example of the correction procedure on a PE sample
- Figure A.3 – Comparison between original and corrected reference signals with a sample free of charge under moderate voltage
- A.4 Estimation of the correction coefficients
- Figure A.4 – Electric field in a sample under voltage with spacecharge calculated from original and corrected signals
- Figure A.5 – Geometrical characteristics of the referencesignal for the correction coefficient estimation
- Figure A.6 – Reference signal corrected with coefficients graphically obtained and adjusted
- A.5 MATLAB® code
- Figure A.7 – Electric field in a sample under voltage with space charge calculated with graphically obtained coefficient and adjusted coefficient
- Table A.1 – Variants of symbols used in the text
- Annex B (informative)Linearity verification of the measuring system [Go to Page]
- B.1 Linearity verification
- B.2 Sample conditions
- B.3 Linearity verification procedure
- B.4 Example of linearity verification
- Figure B.1 – Voltage signals obtained from the oscilloscopeby the amplifier with different amplifications
- Figure B.2 – Current signals induced by the sample, consideringthe input impedance and the amplification of the amplifier
- Figure B.3 – Relationship between the measured current peakof the first electrode and applied voltage
- Annex C (informative)Measurement examples for planar plaque samples [Go to Page]
- C.1 Samples
- C.2 Pressure pulse generation
- C.3 Calibration of sample and signal
- Figure C.1 – Measured current signal under −5,8 kV
- C.4 Testing sample and experimental results [Go to Page]
- C.4.1 Measurement results
- Figure C.2 – First measured current signal (< 1 min)
- Figure C.3 – Measured current signal after 1,5 h under −46,4 kV [Go to Page]
- C.4.2 Internal electric field distribution in the testing sample
- Figure C.4 – Measured current signal without applied voltage after 1,5 h under −46,4 kV
- Figure C.5 – Internal electric field distribution under −5,8 kV
- Figure C.6 – Internal electric field distributionunder −46,4 kV, at the initial state
- Figure C.7 – Internal electric field distribution after 1,5 h under −46,4 kV [Go to Page]
- C.4.3 Distribution of space charge density in the testing sample
- Figure C.8 – Internal electric field distribution withoutapplied voltage after 1,5 h under −46,4 kV
- Figure C.9 – Space charge distribution after 1,5 h under –46,4 kV
- Figure C.10 – Space charge distribution without applied voltageafter 1,5 h under −46,4 kV
- Annex D (informative)Measurement examples for coaxial geometry samples [Go to Page]
- D.1 Example of linearity verification of coaxial geometry [Go to Page]
- D.1.1 Sample conditions
- D.1.2 Linearity verification procedure
- D.1.3 Example of linearity verification
- D.2 Verification of the current peak area ratio between the outer and inner electrodes [Go to Page]
- D.2.1 Verification principle
- Figure D.1 – Measured currents from the LDPE coaxial sampleunder different applied voltages in a few minutes
- Figure D.2 – Relationships between the peak amplitude of the measuredcurrent at outer and inner electrodes and applied voltage [Go to Page]
- D.2.2 Example of verification of the current peak area ratio
- D.3 Testing sample and experimental results [Go to Page]
- D.3.1 Raw results of measurements
- Figure D.3 – First measured current signal (< 1 min) for the coaxial sample
- Table D.2 – Analysis of ratio between theoretical and measured peak area for measured current signal [Go to Page]
- Figure D.4 – Measured current signals for the coaxial sample at beginning and after 2 h under −90,0 kV
- Figure D.5 – Measured current signals for the coaxial sample after 2 h under −90,0 kV, and without applied voltage after 2 h under high voltage [Go to Page]
- D.3.2 Electric field distribution in the coaxial sample
- Figure D.6 – Internal electric field distribution under –22,5 kV for the coaxial sample
- Figure D.7 – Internal electric field distribution under –90,0 kVfor the coaxial sample, at the initial state
- Figure D.8 – Internal electric field distribution after 2 h under –90,0 kV [Go to Page]
- D.3.3 Space charge distribution in the coaxial sample
- Figure D.9 – Internal electric field distribution withoutapplied voltage after 2 h under −90,0 kV
- Figure D.10 – Space charge distribution with and withoutapplied voltage after 2 h under −90,0 kV
- Bibliography [Go to Page]