Security checkdata:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/b97cb/b97cb213b46faeaaa7c66396a6ae87aea1b9e409" alt=""
Please login to your personal account to use this feature.
Please login to your authorized staff account to use this feature.
Are you sure you want to empty the cart?
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/bd058/bd05802794419999aad39acaac37ca55b8a61770" alt=""
Biophilic Design: Contributions to Green Building Certifications, 2024
- Slide 1
- Slide 2: Biophilic Design: Contributions to Green Building Certifications
- Slide 3
- Slide 4
- Slide 5
- Slide 6: How to Use This Online Learning Course
- Slide 7: Purpose and Learning Objectives
- Slide 8: Contents
- Slide 9: INTRODUCTION TO BIOPHILIC DESIGN
- Slide 10: Defining Biophilic Design
- Slide 11: Historical Context and Cultural Roots
- Slide 12: Early Proponents of Biophilic Design
- Slide 13: Importance of Biophilic Design in Architecture
- Slide 14: Importance of Biophilic Design in Architecture
- Slide 15: Importance of Biophilic Design in Architecture
- Slide 16: Case Study: Pipedrive, Tallinn, Estonia
- Slide 17: BIOPHILIC DESIGN FRAMEWORKS
- Slide 18: Biophilic Design Elements
- Slide 19: #1. Environmental Features
- Slide 20: #2. Natural Shapes and Forms
- Slide 21: #3. Natural Patterns and Processes
- Slide 22: Case Study: Ellison Institute of Technology, Los Angeles, CA
- Slide 23: #4. Light and Space
- Slide 24: #4. Light and Space
- Slide 25: Case Study: NOA Restaurant, Tallinn, Estonia
- Slide 26: #5. Place-Based Relationships
- Slide 27: #5. Place-Based Relationships
- Slide 28: Case Study: Maidla Nature Resort, Raplamaa, Estonia
- Slide 29: #6. Evolved Human–Nature Relationships
- Slide 30: #6. Evolved Human–Nature Relationships
- Slide 31: Practice of Biophilic Design
- Slide 32: Practice of Biophilic Design
- Slide 33: Review Question
- Slide 34: Answer
- Slide 35: 14 Patterns of Biophilic Design
- Slide 36: Nature in the Space
- Slide 37: Natural Analogues
- Slide 38: Nature of the Space
- Slide 39: Review Question
- Slide 40: Answer
- Slide 41: GREEN BUILDING RATING PROGRAMS AND STANDARDS
- Slide 42: Biophilic Design vs. Sustainable Design
- Slide 43: LEED v4.1
- Slide 44: LEED v4.1
- Slide 45: WELL v2
- Slide 46: WELL v2
- Slide 47: WELL v2
- Slide 48: SITES v2
- Slide 49: LBC 4.1
- Slide 50: LBC 4.1
- Slide 51: Review Question
- Slide 52: Answer
- Slide 53: PUTTING BIOPHILIC DESIGN INTO PRACTICE
- Slide 54: Thermally Modified Wood in Biophilic Design
- Slide 55: Case Study: Camp Double Oak, Greentown, PA
- Slide 56: Case Study: Camp Double Oak, Greentown, PA
- Slide 57: Case Study: MSD Headquarters, St. Louis, MO
- Slide 58: Case Study: Forest Bath House, Fairview, NC
- Slide 59: Case Study: Squibb Park Bridge, Brooklyn, NY
- Slide 60: Case Study: Squibb Park Bridge, Brooklyn, NY
- Slide 61: Case Study: Production Complex, Reola, Estonia
- Slide 62: Case Study: Production Complex, Reola, Estonia
- Slide 63: Case Study: Production Complex, Reola, Estonia
- Slide 64: Case Study: Production Complex, Reola, Estonia
- Slide 65: Case Study: Production Complex, Reola, Estonia
- Slide 66: Case Study: Production Complex, Reola, Estonia
- Slide 67: SUMMARY AND RESOURCES
- Slide 68: Summary
- Slide 69: Resources
- Slide 70: Thank You [Go to Page]